Md. Court of Special Appeals Throws Out Lawyer's Claim That Case- Referral Agreement Was Breached
The Daily Record (Baltimore) › April 06, 2009
Linked as:
The Daily Record (Baltimore) › April 06, 2009
Linked as:Summary
Saying the clients' interests remain paramount, the Court of Special Appeals has thrown out a lawyer's claim that his co-counsel breached a case-referral agreement by not consulting him before settlement and telling the clients they had a potential malpractice claim against him.
In its 3-0 opinion, the intermediate court said holding a lawyer liable to another for advice given to a client could chill the attorney-client relationship and the guidance offered.See the full content of this document
Extract
Md. Court of Special Appeals Throws Out Lawyer's Claim That Case- Referral Agreement Was Breached
"'An attorney's preoccupation or concern with potential negligence claims by third parties might result in a diminution in the quality of the legal services received by the client as the attorney might weigh the client's interest against the attorney's fear of liability as a third party,'" the court ...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
garrison says bresch matter should have been handled differently | From Snoozer to Shootout Once Again Patriot Magic Comes From Brady Vinatieri | riverside hangs on for 9-8 baseball win high school sports | 2007 nfl draft: team-by-team recap | Sentencia nº 938 de Consiglio di Stato, February 14, 2011 | Sentencia nº 3439 de Consiglio di Stato July 06 2009 | sentencia nº 3120 de consiglio di stato june 16 2009 | Sentencia nº 3420 de Consiglio di Stato, July 21, 2010