Commentary: Governor Should Veto the State Records Shield Bill
The Daily Record (Baltimore) › May 09, 2010
Linked as:
The Daily Record (Baltimore) › May 09, 2010
Linked as:Summary
Recently, I received a marketing piece from a state legislator touting the accomplishments of the General Assembly's past session. Among other things, the legislator noted that he'd helped pass Senate Bill 935, which would shield certain court records related to peace or protective orders from the public, thus preventing children, friends, acquaintances and voyeurs from discovering another person's marital difficulties through public venues.
At the time of this publication, the bill was still on the governor's desk. He should veto the bill and send it back to the Assembly for necessary improvements.See the full content of this document
Extract
Commentary: Governor Should Veto the State Records Shield Bill
While the bill may have a worthy objective, it exemplifies how legislators and bureaucrats are ill-equipped to solve many modern problems where technology has created new paradigms, even when there is a political will to do so. The bill ultimately would fai...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
21 CFR 1271.210 - Supplies and reagents. | 5 CFR 2637.101 Purpose and policy. | 42 usc 1437 - sec. 1437r. public housing resident management | United States of America Plaintiff-Appellee v Kevin Glade Thomson Also Known as Kevin Thom... | Decisión nº 1 de Juzgado Primero de Primera Instancia Civil y Mercantil de Merida Extensión Mérida de February 22 2012 | Sentencia nº 6784 de Consiglio di Stato, December 19, 2008 | sentencia nº 5775 de consiglio di stato, november 19, 2009 | Sentencia nº 77668 de Corte de Apelaciones de Santiago Sala Primera March 19 2012