Maryland Court of Special Appeals Case Summaries: February 6, 2011
The Daily Record (Baltimore) › February 13, 2011
Linked as:
The Daily Record (Baltimore) › February 13, 2011
Linked as:Summary
Immigration
Retroactivity of lawSee the full content of this document
Extract
Maryland Court of Special Appeals Case Summaries: February 6, 2011
BOTTOM LINE: The Supreme Court decision in Padilla v. Kentucky did not apply retroactively to defendant's case and, therefore, defendant's 1999 guilty plea was valid, even though he was not advised, prior to acceptance of his plea, of the immigration consequences attendant to his plea.
CASE: Miller v. State, No. 1907, Sept. Term, 2009 (filed Dec. 29, 2010) (Judges Meredith, Wright & MOYLAN (retired, specially assigned)).FACTS: In the circuit court on June 1, 1999, Lincoln Miller, a native of Belize, tendered a plea of guilty to the charge of ...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Ice proof adhesive. | CreditSights Web Seminar -- Analyzing the Financial Conditions of a Company s Balance Sheet and P&L To Optimize Your Investment Objectives. | talx reports 54 percent growth in third-quarter earnings from continuing operations raises full-year guidance. | americhip international inc provides update on american production machining. | decisión nº 2c244-05 de tribunal segundo de control los teques de miranda de august 01 2006 | Decisión de Tribunal Primero de Primera Instancia en lo Civil Mercantil Transito y Agrario de N... | Decisión nº 243-06 de Corte de Apelaciones Sala 3 de Zulia de June 01 2006 | Decisión nº 1287-06 de Tribunal Duodécimo de Control de Zulia (Extensión Maracaibo), de April 10, 2006