Md. Court Releases Man Found Ncr, Says Expert Testimony On Danger Not an Absolute Requirement

Summary


A mentally ill Baltimore man who was committed to the state health department was not required to present expert testimony to prove his fitness for release at trial, the Court of Appeals held yesterday, reversing a lower appellate panel's decision.

While such testimony may be highly relevant, it is not an "absolute requirement" and its necessity must be judged on a case- by-case basis, according to the high court.

See the full content of this document

Extract


Md. Court Releases Man Found Ncr, Says Expert Testimony On Danger Not an Absolute Requirement

The jury could determine whether Linwood Bean, the 56-year-old petitioner, poses a danger to society upon his release without testimony from a doctor who agreed with his stance.

WHAT THE COURT HELD

Case: Linwood Bean...

See the full content of this document

Sponsored links




ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company