Officer's Files Remain Confidential, for Now
The Daily Record (Baltimore) › September 07, 2004
Linked as:
The Daily Record (Baltimore) › September 07, 2004
Linked as:Summary
A criminal defendant was not entitled to discovery of certain parts of a Baltimore police officer's internal affairs file because the trial court did not follow proper procedure in assessing his need for it, the Court of Special Appeals has held.
The intermediate appellate court vacated Baltimore City Circuit Judge John N. Prevas' order directing the release of certain portions of arresting officer Detective Michael Dressel's personnel file to Tevonne Clark, against whom he was scheduled to testify.See the full content of this document
Extract
Officer's Files Remain Confidential, for Now
The trial court's failure to adhere to the procedure laid out in two of the appellate court's earlier cases, Reynolds v. State (1993) and Blades v. Woods (1995), compelled it to reverse Preva...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
by the numbers going veg | Women's History Activities Planned in Santa Fe, Espaola | Hummer Takes On Rubicon | los malos hbitos de salud afectan el desempeo estudiantil | Sentencia nº 6134 de Consiglio di Stato December 14 2009 | Sentencia nº 788 de Consiglio di Stato, February 13, 2008 | Sentenza nº 73 de Consiglio di Stato January 11 2011 | Dictamen nº 47260 de Contraloría General de la República, de August 23, 1978